PRODUCT DEMO · SYNTHETIC DATA

What would stronger evidence look like?

These examples demonstrate how EDGE evaluates evidence. They are not findings about real financial markets.

Review exactly what will be tested

THE CLAIM

“A breakout with a pre-specified momentum condition has a persistent advantage.”

Does the pre-specified RSI-confirmed breakout retain a positive control difference across nearby settings and separate periods?

Market / timeframe: Artificial SYNTHETIC-UNIT · 15m · completed UTC bars
Setup / condition: Close beyond the previous 20 completed bars; RSI(14) > 55 / < 45; no threshold chosen after inspecting this illustration.
Outcome / comparison: Average signed return after 4 bars, compared with ordinary breakouts matched by direction, time and volatility. This does not test win rate or execute trades.
What would support the claim?: A positive difference with useful uncertainty bounds that survives costs, nearby settings and separate periods.
What would weaken it?: An interval spanning zero, too few observations or a result that depends on one setting or period.

Frozen teaching hypothesis · Demo Version 1. These rules are fixed. This is not a saved account strategy or a new calculation.

I understand this is synthetic teaching evidence, not a real-market result.

Opens an existing illustration. No research is executed.